REGULATORY WATCH BRIEF Moderate 44 🔨 Court Ruling decided

Ninth Circuit rejects Google’s security argument against interoperability

The ruling clears a major legal obstacle to mandated interoperability, reinforcing privacy‑friendly competition.

ImpactModerate 44
Type🔨 Court Ruling
Statusdecided case outcome
JurisdictionUS

What happened

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Google’s claim opening its platform to third‑party app stores would harm security, rejecting the argument. The decision supports enforcement of interoperability requirements such as those in the EU Digital Markets Act.

Why it matters for trust and compliance

  • Its status is decided. The case has an outcome that others may cite.
  • The ruling clears a major legal obstacle to mandated interoperability, reinforcing privacy‑friendly competition.
  • It relates to DMA. The regulations library explains what that law requires.

Who is affected

technology platform developer Google

Recommended actions

  1. Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.
  2. Map the security requirements to existing controls and close gaps.
  3. Identify affected vendors and update due-diligence and contract terms.

Regulations library

Every US state privacy law, on one map

24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.

  • In force
  • Coming into force
  • Sector laws
AK ME VT NH WA ID MT ND MN IL WI MI NY RI MA OR NV WY SD IA IN OH PA NJ CT CA UT CO NE MO KY WV VA MD DE AZ NM KS AR TN NC SC DC OK LA MS AL GA HI TX FL